Middle_Man

[quote=Quirk][quote=Wotcher][quote=Portfolioso]Its just a matter of preferences or convenience.[/quote] This is why AOL has provided us with a generous "block" feature. And uhhhh... I don't actually know anyone faggy enough to pounce me right when I sign on. Guess you guys just suck at friends. =][/...

[quote=Wotcher]"hey i'm gonna sign onto an internet communication client invisibly so that i don't have to... communicate with anyone. intuitive!"[/quote]

i completely agree, same with using "ghosting" at all

[quote=Portfolioso]Nope it's possible to sign on invisible, away etc. It all deals with which packets get sent during the logon process. Rumor has it that they are interested in some kind of sign on options. It will not be implemented until much later on when most of the core features are added (ali...

uhh, these?

[quote=Quirk][quote="Thermite Man"]requested im sure, I havent use win in about a year but if i recall you can do that int he AIM pref's...[/quote]

i thought it was there too... but now i can't find it.[/quote]

M:M has a feature that overrides this. I don't believe AIM does.

[quote=hannaxbear]Yeah I think the AIM's away box is super ugly and extremely annoying when you're talking while you're away. As much as I hate Triton, I like how the away message section is in your buddy list (at the top).[/quote]

i totally agree

[quote=Cronus]Port, offline messaging is actually supported in the protocol. The AIM SDK should have an interface for this shortly. If doing your own code, its as simple as sending the message anyway, waiting for the server to return a user unavailable error, and then re-sending the message with an ...

same here

mmmm.... alcoholic big screen TV.... *drooool*

**SPOILER**
it’s string cheese.